IndyStar is reporting that FB/RB/Punisher Luke Lawton has been traded to the Philadelphia Eagles. Curiously enough, the Eagles also signed former Colts FB/DT Dan Klecko in the offseason, giving them two players from the Colts that had played the same (though rarely used) position. Darrel Reid, watch out.
The move removes Lawton’s salary of $445K from the team’s salary cap. Under the Rule of 51, the void is filled by a salary of $370K, resulting in a cap savings of only $75K. The reported compensation for the trade is a conditional 2009 draft choice.
There are potentially two impacts from this move; what will the team do at the FB position and how will this impact the roster at RB. As to the second point, the team has traditionally carried four backs; three truer RB’s and a RB/FB tweener. With the lone RB/FB now gone from the roster, the question becomes 1) will the team convert a RB to a RB/FB and still carry four, 2) will the team pick up a FB and carry three, or 3) will the team convert another player and still carry up to four RB’s. Personally, I think the latter option is the most likely. No RB right now seems to have the ability or size to adequately do the job, and while Polian has compared Mike Hart to former Colt James Mungro, Hart seems to be an unlikely candidate for the job. Similarly, the team’s desire to build from within (and to not squander salary cap space on lesser used positions) would suggest that the replacement is on the team.
While Darrell Reid has played the position in the past, my dark horse candidate for the job is current TE Gijon Robinson. Physically, at 6′1″ and 255 lbs., Robinson fits the bill. Further, as he was being drafted, some considered him to be not just a TE, but more of an H-Back and FB, able to line up in the backfield as a blocking back. Lastly, as FB is not a position of great usage for the team, a full-time FB may take up a roster spot that could be used elsewhere. While in 2007 the team only carried three TE’s, it has historically at times carried more. In 2005 and 2006, the team carried four TE’s (Clark, Utecht, Hartsock, and Fletcher) and if Robinson can also play as a FB, such a move would surely help him get into a tight TE lineup with Clark and two rookies (Tamme and Santi).
For Lawton, I saw the writing on the wall when a recent article on Colts.com on Lawton quoted him as saying in regards to his size, “It’s just a better fit for a guy like myself – just to be lighter, and a more balanced back.” Lawton, who’s primary contributions came not as a runner but as a blocking FB and blocking up-man on kickoff returns was seemingly not trying to make the team on the basis of those strengths, but rather as a true RB, a position in which he would be competing with five other backs (Addai, Rhodes, Hart, Keith, and Dawson), four of which already had more experience at the position and all five of which seemed to be a better fit.
In that same article, Lawton is quoted as saying, “I’ve always thought I could play running back…what fullback doesn’t?“. Unfortunately for him, that desire to play RB may have gotten him traded from the one team that had let him play anything during the regular season. Hopefully, he can continue his dream in Philly, but if not, he may have made a choice to be unemployed rather than be a FB.
Best of luck,
- BAV -